Project

General

Profile

ENG frm #7049

BackUp less than 3GB takes more than 15 minutes

Added by Forum Synchronizer 4 days ago. Updated about 9 hours ago.

Status:
Information provided
Priority:
..
Assignee:
-
Target version:
ID:
β-tester:
harlan4096
Product:
KTS
Language:
en-US
OS:
Win 10, x64
Fixed in:

#1 Updated by Dmitriy Pisarets 4 days ago

Hello! There are too many files. Please, try to archive them in 1 zip-file and it will be backuped very fast. We suppose it's normal speed for 32 000 + files.

#2 Updated by Forum Synchronizer 4 days ago

harlan4096:
<p>Hum... I think it's not acceptable, there are many free tools that "eat" (backup) tons of GBs in a short period of time, independently of the number of files, Macrium Reflect for example...</p>
<p></p>
<p>This is a common situation Kaspersky will find in a standard user system, with tons of pictures and videos (not my case / this case), and not with only 2,8GB, but probably tons of gigabytes in pictures, videos, documents...</p>
<p></p>
<p>How can We ask the user to compress all those files 1st in a file and then run KTS backup... <img src="/plugins/nodebb-plugin-composer-kl/vendor/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-undecided.gif" alt="undecided" /></p>
<p></p>
<div id="simple-translate">
<div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="color: #000000;">Hum ... Creo que no es aceptable ... hay muchas herramientas gratuitas que "comen" (copia de seguridad) toneladas de GB en un corto período de tiempo, independientemente del número de archivos, Macrium Reflect, por ejemplo ...</p>
<p style="color: #737373;"></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

#3 Updated by Forum Synchronizer 4 days ago

<p>Hum... I think it's not acceptable, there are many free tools that "eat" (backup) tons of GBs in a short period of time, independently of the number of files, Macrium Reflect Free for example...</p>
<p></p>
<p>This is a common situation Kaspersky will find in a standard user system, with tons of pictures and videos (not my case / this case), and not with only 2,8GB, but probably tons of gigabytes in pictures, videos, documents...</p>
<p></p>
<p>How can We ask the user to compress all those files 1st in a file and then run KTS backup... <img src="/plugins/nodebb-plugin-composer-kl/vendor/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-undecided.gif" alt="undecided" /></p>
<p></p>
<div id="simple-translate">
<div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="color: #000000;">Hum ... Creo que no es aceptable ... hay muchas herramientas gratuitas que "comen" (copia de seguridad) toneladas de GB en un corto período de tiempo, independientemente del número de archivos, Macrium Reflect, por ejemplo ...</p>
<p style="color: #737373;"></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

#4 Updated by Forum Synchronizer 4 days ago

<p>Hum... I think it's not acceptable, there are many free tools that "eat" (backup) tons of GBs in a short period of time, independently of the number of files, Macrium Reflect Free for example...</p>
<p></p>
<p>This is a common situation Kaspersky will find in a standard user system, with tons of pictures and videos (not my case / this case), and not with only 2,8GB, but probably tons of gigabytes in pictures, videos, documents...</p>
<p></p>
<p>How can We ask the user to compress all those files 1st in a file and then run KTS backup... <img src="/plugins/nodebb-plugin-composer-kl/vendor/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-undecided.gif" alt="undecided" /></p>

#5 Updated by Forum Synchronizer 4 days ago

xzz123:
<p>@harlan4096</p>
<p>How about running a 4K performance test of your SSD using AS SSD Benchmark?</p>
<p>If the test shows your SSD still in good health, than maybe we should condsider poor design of K's backup tool.</p>

#6 Updated by Forum Synchronizer 1 day ago

harlan4096:
<p>Here are the test I performed this weekend:</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/3UYRNr6.png" alt="" width="499" height="506" /></p>
<p></p>
<p>Then I enabled <strong>Rapid Mode</strong> with <strong>Samsung Magician</strong> tool, and then:</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/d0epj1W.png" alt="" width="500" height="509" /></p>
<p></p>
<p><strong>Samsung Magician</strong> tests:</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/24vOtIH.png" alt="" width="908" height="544" /></p>
<p></p>
<p>And re ran a new KTS2021beta BackUp task, but I got the same time: 16 minutes to copy about 2,8GBytes of files:</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/0HlWVPX.png" alt="" width="776" height="315" /></p>
<p></p>
<p>Anyway, I still think this time is excessive for less than 3 GBytes.</p>
<div id="simple-translate">
<div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="color: #000000;"></p>
<p style="color: #737373;"></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

#7 Updated by Forum Synchronizer 1 day ago

<p>Here are the test I performed this weekend:</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/3UYRNr6.png" alt="" width="499" height="506" /></p>
<p></p>
<p>Then I enabled <strong>Rapid Mode</strong> with <strong>Samsung Magician</strong> tool, and then:</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/d0epj1W.png" alt="" width="500" height="509" /></p>
<p></p>
<p><strong>Samsung Magician</strong> tests:</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/24vOtIH.png" alt="" width="908" height="544" /></p>
<p></p>
<p>And re ran a new KTS2021beta BackUp task, but I got the same time: 16 minutes to copy about 2,8GBytes of files:</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/0HlWVPX.png" alt="" width="776" height="315" /></p>
<p></p>
<p>It is also true that this laptop does not support SATA6 but only SATA3, anyway I still think this time is excessive for less than 3 GBytes.</p>
<div id="simple-translate">
<div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="color: #000000;"></p>
<p style="color: #737373;"></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

#8 Updated by Forum Synchronizer 1 day ago

xzz123:
<p>As far as I consider, rapid mode and tSequential read and write speed actually do not help this kind of scenario</p>
<p>In this case, I believe, 4K performance is much useful. And screenshot suggest your 4K performance is not good at all.</p>
<p>If 4K is bad, when dealing with tons of small files, will take very very long time.</p>

#9 Updated by Forum Synchronizer 1 day ago

<p>As far as I consider, rapid mode and Sequential read and write speed actually do not help this kind of scenario</p>
<p>In this case, I believe, 4K performance is much useful. And screenshot suggest your 4K performance is not good at all.</p>
<p>If 4K is bad, when dealing with tons of small files, will take very very long time. How about those your files, are they large data or peices of sepertated files?</p>

#10 Updated by Forum Synchronizer about 9 hours ago

Dmitriy.Pisarets:
<p>also, please note that, in beta version traces and drivers verifiers are turned on, they also have an impact on product working speed. If you can, please turn off them and try to reproduce it with perf logs</p>

#11 Updated by Forum Synchronizer about 9 hours ago

harlan4096:
<p>All the tests were performed with traces and App. + Drv. Verif. disabled, I forgot to mention it ;)</p>
<div id="simple-translate">
<div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="color: #000000;"></p>
<p style="color: #737373;"></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

#12 Updated by Forum Synchronizer about 9 hours ago

<p>All the tests were performed with traces and App. + Drv. Verif. disabled, except the one when I collected traces, I forgot to mention it ;)</p>
<div id="simple-translate">
<div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="color: #000000;"></p>
<p style="color: #737373;"></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


Description

<p><strong>Reproduction steps:</strong></p>
<p><span>Just followed the BackUp wizard and selected the files (see attached screen-shot), no more than 3GB, and ran the task.</span></p>
<p><span></span></p>
<p><strong>Actual result:</strong></p>
<p><span>It took about 16 minutes to copy less than 3GB, in the system hard disk (Samsung SSD 850 EVO),</span></p>
<p><span></span></p>
<p><strong>Expected Result:</strong></p>
<p><span>Faster speeds to copy.</span></p>
<p><span></span></p>
<p><span>Screen-shots: https://imgur.com/a/97SVItv&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p>
<p><span></span></p>
<div id="simple-translate">
<div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="color: #000000;"></p>
<p style="color: #737373;"></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Also available in: Atom PDF